Aroma Home Diffuser,Smart Home Diffuser,Room Scent Diffuser,Smart Aroma Diffuser Guangzhou Chiyang Scent Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.diffuserscent.com
The existing "Pesticide Management Regulations" has existed for 13 years, but it is still managing pesticide companies that have undergone tremendous changes in the situation and environment. The government departments have continuously raised the threshold for pesticide registration, which has led to a significant increase in the cost of registration of pesticides. In particular, the registration fee for new pesticide products is calculated in millions, and the registration fee has accounted for 30% to 40% of the production cost of pesticides. The overall cost has risen significantly, making pesticide companies overwhelmed.
The good news is that the Ministry of Agriculture has begun to take the lead in revising the old “Regulationsâ€; the bad news is that the reporter’s “Pesticide Management Regulations (Revised Second Draft for Comments)†did not make companies feel that Style changes. A person in charge of the company, who asked not to be named, told reporters: “The revised draft is still the same. It is registered for registration and managed for management. There is no content on how to promote the healthy development of the company. We hope that the “Regulations†can be rational The status quo and voices of pesticide companies.â€
According to Sun Shubao, secretary general of the China Pesticide Industry Association, the latest revised draft more clearly clarifies the division of functions among government departments, instead of focusing on how to optimize management and how to rationalize pesticide registration issues.
In particular, the newly released “Pesticide Industry Policy†of the country clearly stated that it is necessary to promote the promotion of advantageous enterprises to become bigger and stronger, and to improve the enterprise’s innovation capability, which gave the company great encouragement. However, these "new styles" did not blow into the newly revised "Regulations."
The relevant person in charge of Jiangsu Kesheng Group Co., Ltd. said that the recently released “Pesticide Industry Policy†explicitly mentioned that the promotion of advantageous enterprises was bigger and stronger, and the newly revised “Regulations†did not explicitly mention this, nor did they mention How to promote the enterprise's intensive and brand development content. Zhang Wenjun, general manager of Zhejiang Shenghua Bioc Bio Co., Ltd., said that the new “Regulations†should be organically integrated with industrial development policies. However, the current revised draft is out of touch with industrial policies and should encourage enterprises to merge and reorganize, and thus increase industrial concentration. . Sun Shubao also believes that the current management of pesticide product licenses is inconsistent with industrial policies, industry development plans, etc., which can easily lead to blind licenses, overcapacity, and illegal production.
Some companies stated that in addition to strengthening the management of pesticide production, the “Regulations†should also highlight the current problems of weak management and use of pesticides. For example, the incident of Hainan poisoning and cowpea that occurred early in the year, and the responsibility is entirely due to pesticide manufacturers. It is unfair and irrational. Farmers are not using pesticides in accordance with relevant regulations.
Some companies believe that under the premise of clarifying the division of responsibilities among relevant administrative authorities of the State Council in pesticide management, the current issue of multi-headed management, mutual administration, overlapping functions and lack of communication and coordination mechanisms should be solved in accordance with the principle of powers and responsibilities. Moreover, the "Regulations" should be amended to follow the principle of convenience, should save social resources as much as possible, reduce the burden on enterprises, so that companies can move forward on the road to innovation and development.
The relevant person in charge of Qingdao Hansheng Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. suggested that in view of the fact that crops, diseases, pests and weeds, and the level of drugs used in various parts of the country are quite different, over-concentration of management is not effective, and implementation of central and local authorities is more in line with national conditions. In other words, the total amount of pesticides, the structure of products (raw drugs and dosage forms), the overall industrial layout, the original drug registration, development planning and the creation of new varieties, new additives, etc., are managed by the central government; It was decided that the preparations only play a role in giving full play to their strengths, improving their inadequacies or expanding their scope of application, and extending their useful life. They cannot fundamentally change the basic biological properties of the original drug. Therefore, careful examination of the safety of the original drug should be the focus of pesticide management. Centrally managed. At the same time, the original drug that has been allowed to be produced does not need to be repeated after the dosage form has been processed. Because the preparation process is only a physical mixing or physical chemical process, new compounds with different basic properties are not formed, mainly during processing. The safety of additives and the physical and chemical stability of the formulations can be investigated, tested and monitored.
The opinions collected by reporters at the scene also include: setting up an effective exit mechanism for pesticide companies in the Regulations, leading to the orderly withdrawal of pesticide companies that are not in line with industrial policies and development plans, and with backward technology and equipment, and that do not meet pollutant discharge standards; With regard to the problem of weak corporate innovation capability, it is proposed to increase the provisions of the “Regulations†for innovative products and technologies, and to improve the overall level of the industry. At the same time, the protection of intellectual property rights in pesticide registration and pesticide production licenses should be strengthened, and innovative enterprises should be fostered better. Rapid development; it is proposed to strengthen government supervision responsibility in the “Regulations†to crack down on illegal production enterprises, maintain a fair and orderly market environment, improve and improve pesticide export management, and emphasize that enterprises that produce pesticide products must obtain legal production qualifications. And environmental protection meets the required standards and improves and improves the pesticide export management system. Pesticide companies hope that these opinions can arouse the attention of the relevant state departments and make the “Regulations†really play a role in regulating companies and markets and promoting the healthy and sustainable development of the pesticide industry.
The year 2010 is the first year of structural adjustment and transformation and upgrading of the pesticide industry in China. At the 10th National Pesticide Exchange Conference held in Shanghai on October 19th, many companies mentioned this point. When a reporter asked how to break through the difficulties of overcapacity, low industrial concentration, and unreasonable product structure, the entrepreneurs first introduced the topic to the “Pesticide Management†currently being led by the Ministry of Agriculture. Regulations.